| |

Praise be to Allah, the Lord
of the worlds, to Him belong the endowments and the befitting
perfections and commendations. I ask Allah to raise the rank of
Prophet Muhammad, sallallahu ^alayhi wa sallam, and to protect
his nation from that which he fears for it.
Thereafter:
The saying that Allah, ta^ala,
exists without a place is the belief and the creed of the Messenger
of Allah, sallallahu ^alayhi wa sallam, the Companions and those
who graciously followed them, and it shall be until the Day of
Judgment. The proof of this precious statement is what Allah said
in the Qur'an, in Surat ash-Shura, ayah 11:
which means: "There is
nothing like Him and He has the attribute of Hearing and Seeing."
This ayah absolutely and totally clears Allah of resembling the
creation. It comprises that Allah, ta^ala, is different from the
creations in the Self, Attributes, and Doings. Hence, it shows
that Allah, ta^ala, exists without a place, because the one who
exists in a place would, by nature, be composed of atoms, i.e.,
he would be a body, occupying a space, and Allah, ta^ala, is clear
of occupying spaces.
Al-Bukhariyy, al-Bayhaqiyy and
Ibn alJarud related that the Messenger of Allah, sallallahu
^alayhi wa sallam, said:
which means: "Allah existed
eternally and there was nothing else." This hadith proves
that Allah was alone in al-'azal, (the status of existence without
a beginning,) i.e., before creating any of the creation. There
was nothing with Him: no place, no space, no sky, no light, and
no darkness. It is determined in the rules of the Religion and
the judgments of the sound mind that Allah, the Exalted, does
not change. Hence, it is impossible that after having been existing
without a place, He would become in a place, because this is a
development, and the development is a sign of needing others,
and the one who needs others is not God.
Imam Abu Mansur al-Baghdadiyy
related in his book, Al-Farqu Bayn alFiraq, that Imam ^Aliyy,
the fourth of the caliphs, may Allah reward his deeds, said:
which means: "Allah existed
eternally and there was no place, and He now is as He was, i.e.,
without a place."
Imam Abu Hanifah, who is one
of the authorities of as-Salaf, said in his book Al-Fiqh alAbsat:
"Allah existed eternally and there was no place. He existed
before creating the creation. He existed, and there was no place,
creation, or thing; and He is the Creator of everything."
Imam al-Hafidh al-Bayhaqiyy
said in his book, Al-Asma'u was-Sifat, on page 400: "....
What was mentioned towards the end of the hadith is an indication
of denying Allah has a place and denying the slave is alike to
Allah, wherever he was in proximity or remoteness. Allah, the
Exalted, is adhDhahir--hence, it is valid to know about Him
by proofs. Allah is al-Batin--hence, it is invalid that He would
be in a place." He also said: "Some of our companions
used as a proof to refute the place to Allah the saying of the
Prophet, sallallahu ^alayhi wa sallam : 'You are adh-Dhahir and
there is nothing above You, and You are al-Batin and there is
nothing underneath You.' Therefore, if there is nothing above
Him and nothing underneath Him, He is not in a place."
Imam Ahmad Ibn Salamah, Abu
Ja^far atTahawiyy, who was born in the year 237 after Hijrah,
wrote a book called Al-^Aqidah atTahawiyyah. He mentioned
that the content of his book is an elucidation of the creed of
Ahl asSunnah wal Jama^ah, which is the creed of Imam Abu
Hanifah, who died in the year 150 after alHijrah, and his
two companions, Imam Abu Yusuf al-Qadi and Imam Muhammad Ibn alHasan
ash-Shaybaniyy and others. He said in his book: "Allah is
supremely clear of all boundaries, extremes, sides, organs and
instruments. The six directions do not contain Him--these are
attributed to all created things." Such is the saying of
Imam Abu Ja^far who is among the heads of as-Salaf. He explicitly
stated that Allah is clear of being contained by the six directions.
The six directions are above, below, in front of, behind, right,
and left.
The linguist and scholar of
hadith, Imam Muhammad Murtada az-Zabidiyy, narrated by a continuous
chain from himself back to Imam Zayn al-^Abidin ^Aliyy Ibn al-Husayn
Ibn ^Aliyy Ibn Abi Talib, (who was among the first of as-Salaf,
who earned the title of as-Sajjad, i.e., the one who prays a lot),
that Zayn al-^Abidin said in his treatise asSahifah as-Sajjadiyyah
about Allah:
which means: "O Allah,
You are clear of all imperfection. You are Allah, the One Who
no place contains You." He also said:
which means: "O Allah,
You are clear of all imperfection. You are Allah, the One Who
is not in boundaries."
In the explanation of al-Bukhariyy in the chapter on Al-Jihad,
Hafidh Ibn Hajar said: "The fact that the two directions
above and below are impossible to be attributes of Allah, does
not necessitate that Allah would not be attributed with aboveness,
because attributing aboveness to Allah is a matter of status and
the impossibility lies in it being physical."
The scholar Imam Zayn ad-Din Ibn Nujaym, the Hanafiyy, in his
book Al-Bahr arRa'iq, on page 129 said: "Whoever says
it is possible that Allah would do a doing in which there is no
wisdom commits blasphemy, and also he commits blasphemy by affirming
a place to Allah, the Exalted."
Imam Ahmad ar-Rifa^iyy al-Kabir,
who lived around the year 600 after al-Hijrah, said:
which means: "The ultimate knowledge about Allah is to be
certain that Allah exists without a how or a place."
Imam Muhammad Ibn Hibah al-Makkiyy,
in his book Hada'iq al-Fusul wa Jawahir al-^Uqul,--also called
Al-^Aqidat-as-Salahiyyah because he gave it as a gift to Sultan
Salah-ad-Din al-Ayyubiyy who ordered that this book be taught
to the children in schools and broadcast from the top of minarets--said:
which means: "Allah existed
eternally and there was no place, and the judgment about His existence
now is that He is as He was, i.e., without a place."
Imam Ja^far as-Sadiq said: "He
who claims that Allah is in something or on something or from
something, commits ash-shirk. Because if He was in something,
He would be contained, and if He was on something, He would be
carried, and if He was from something, He would be a creature."
Shaykh ^Abdul-Ghaniyy an-Nabulsiyy
said: "He who believes that Allah fills the heavens and earth
or that He is a body sitting above al-^arsh (ceiling of Paradise;
throne) is a kafir."
Imam Abul-Qasim ^Aliyy Ibnul-Hasan Ibn Hibatillah Ibn ^Asakir
said in his ^Aqidah: "Allah existed before the creation.
He does not have a before or an after, an above or a below, a
right or a left, an in front of or a behind, a whole or a part.
It must not be said when was He, where was He, or how was He.
He exists without a place."
Imam Abu Sulayman al-Khattabiyy
said: "What is obligatory upon us and upon every Muslim to
know is that our Lord has no shape or form, because the shape
has a 'how' and 'how' does not apply to Allah or His Attributes."
Know beyond doubt that the question 'how' does not apply to Allah,
because this is a question about shapes, bodies, places, depths
and dimensions; Allah is clear of all of that. Also be firm that
it is invalid to say about Allah "... but we do not know
how", because in essence, it falsely indicates that Allah
has a color, shape, dimensions, body, place, but one is ignorant
of the 'how' of it.
Imam al-Ghazaliyy said: "
Allah, the Exalted, existed eternally and there was no place.
He is not a body, jawhar (atom), or property, and He is not on
a place or in a place."
All of these sayings show that
attributing the sensuous physical aboveness and place to Allah
is contrary to the Qur'an, the Hadith, the Ijma^, and the intellectual
proof. The intellectual proof that Allah exists without a place
lies in the fact that the one who is in a place would have an
area, and the one who has an area is in need of it, and the one
who needs others is not God. Moreover, as the mind determines
that Allah existed without a place before creating places, the
mind determines that after Allah created the places He still exists
without a place.
The scholars like Imam Ahmad arRifa^iyy determined that lifting
the hands and the faces towards the sky when performing du^a (supplication)
is because the heavens are the qiblah of du^a just as the Ka^bah
is the qiblah of asSalah. From the heavens, the mercies and
blessings of Allah descend.
Hence, it is clear for the one
who seeks the truth that the saying that Allah exists without
a place is what complies with the Qur'an, the Hadith, the Ijma^,
and the criteria of the sound intellect. Be firm and certain that
before creating places, Allah Who created everything (places and
others), existed without a place, and after creating places, He
still exists without a place.
Since we have determined that
the creed of the Muslims is that Allah exists without a place
and that the question 'how' does not apply to Allah, it is clear
to us that al-^arsh (the throne) which is the biggest of the creations
of Allah and the ceiling of Paradise, is not a place for Allah,
the Exalted.
Imam Abu Mansur al-Baghdadiyy
related that Imam ^Aliyy Ibn Abi Talib, the fourth caliph, said:
which means: "Allah created
al-^arsh as an indication of His Power and did not take it as
a place for Himself."
Imam Abu Hanifah said in his
book, alWasiyyah,: " ... and He is the Preserver of
al^arsh and other than al-^arsh, without needing it, for
had He been in need, He would not have the power to create the
world and to manage and preserve it. Moreover, had He been in
a place needing to sit and restbefore creating al-^arsh,
where was Allah?" That is, the question 'where was Allah'
would have applied to Him, which is impossible.
Also, in his book, Al-Fiqh al-Absat, Imam Abu Hanifah said: "Allah
existed eternally and there was no place; He existed before creating
the creation. He existed and there was not a place, a creation
or a thing; and He is the Creator of everything. He who says 'I
do not know if my Lord is in the heavens or on the earth,' is
a kafir. Also is a kafir whoever says that 'He is on al-^arsh,
and I do not know whether al-^arsh is in the heaven or on the
earth'."
Consequently, Imam Ahmad declared
a kafir whomever says these last two phrases because they contain
attributing a direction, boundary, and place to Allah. Everything
which has a direction and boundary is by necessity in need of
a Creator. Thus it is not the intention of Imam Abu Hanifah to
prove that the heaven and al-^arsh are places for Allah, as those
who liken Allah to the creation claim. This is by virtue of the
aforementioned saying of the Imam: "Had He been in a place
needing to sit and rest, then before creating al-^arsh where was
Allah?", which is clear in negating that Allah has a direction
or a place.
In his book, Ihya'u ^Ulum ad-Din,
Imam alGhazaliyy said: "... places do not contain Him,
nor do the directions, earth, or heavens. He is attributed with
an istiwa' over al-^arsh as He said in the Qur'an--with the meaning
that He willed--and not as what people may delude. It is an istiwa'
which is clear of touching, resting, holding, moving and containment.
Al-^arsh does not carry Him, but rather al-^arsh and those that
carry al-^arsh are all carried by Allah with His Power and are
subjugated to Him. He is above al-^arsh and above the heavens
and above everything-- in status-- an aboveness that does not
give Him proximity to al-^arsh or the heavens as it does not give
Him farness from earth. He is higher in status than everything:
higher in status than al-^arsh and the heavens, as He is higher
in status than earth and the rest of the creation. "
Shaykh ^Abdul-Ghaniyy an-Nabulsiyy
said: "He who believes that Allah filled the heavens and
earth or that He is a body sitting above al-^arsh, is a kafir."
Ayah 93 of Surat Maryam:
means: "All those in the
heavens and earth must come to Allah as a slave." In his
Tafsir (book of explaining the Qur'an), Imam ar-Raziyy said: "...
and since it is affirmed by this ayah that everything that existed
in the heavens and earth is a slave to Allah, and since it is
obligatory that Allah is clear of being a slave, thus He is clear
of being in a place or direction, or on al-^arsh or al-kursiyy."
Hence Surat Taha, ayah 5, in
the Qur'an:
clearly does not mean that Allah sits on the throne or that Allah
is firmly established on the throne. In the Arabic language, the
word istawa has fifteen (15) different meanings, among of which
are to sit, to subjugate, to protect, to conquer, and to preserve.
Based on what we have covered so far it is clear that it is blasphemous
to apply the meaning 'to sit' to Allah. However the terms to preserve
and to subjugate are in compliance with the Religion and the language.
Imam Hafidh Ibn Rajab al-Hanbaliyy
explained the meaning of al-istiwa' by al-istila', which means
subjugating. That is, Allah attributed Himself with subjugating
al-^arsh in al-'azal (the status of existing without a beginning,
that is, before creating the creation). Since al-^arsh, the largest
creation of Allah, is subjugated to Allah, then everything else
which is smaller than al^arsh is under the control of Allah.
It was affirmed about Imam Malik
Ibn Anas, may Allah reward his deeds, in what alBayhaqiyy
related with a sound chain from the route of ^Abdullah Ibn Wahb,
that "We were at Malik's when a man entered and said, 'O
Aba ^Abdillah, (meaning Imam Malik), ar-Rahmanu ^alal-^arsh istawa,
how did He istawa?' Malik looked down astonishingly and then lifted
his head and said '^alal ^arsh istawa as He attributed to Himself.
It is invalid to say how, and how does not apply to Him. I see
that you are an innovator. Take him out'." Hence, the saying
of Imam Malik, ' How does not apply to Him,' means that His istiwa'
over His ^arsh is without a how, i.e., it is not with a body,
place, shape, or form as sitting, touching, suspending above,
and the like.
Hence, there is no basis for
the saying of those who liken Allah to the creation, which they
falsely attribute to Imam Malik, that al-istiwa' is known and
the how of it is unknown. What they mean by that is that al-istiwa'
is sitting but the how of that sitting is unknown. This saying
of theirs is invalid, because sitting, no matter how it is would
be by organs and parts that fold. Moreover, that term that they
attribute to Imam Malik was not affirmed about him or others.
Imam al-Lalaka'iyy narrated about Umm Salamah and Rabi^ah Ibn
Abi ^Abdar-Rahman:
which means: "The attribute
of istiwa' is not unknown, because it is mentioned in the Qur'an.
Alkayf, that is, the how of it is inconceivable, because
its applicability to Allah is impossible." Hence, the ahadith
and the ayat that attribute aboveness to Allah, refer to the aboveness
of status and not the aboveness of place, direction, touching
or suspending.
In Surat al-An^am ayah 61, Allah
said:
which means: "All the
slaves are subjugated to Allah." Hence the aboveness used
in this ayah is that of subjugation and not that of place or direction.
Beware of what appeared in the
so-called Translation of the Qur'an by Yusuf Ali and the so-called
revised version issued and printed by King Fahd Holy Qur'an Printing
Complex in al-Madinah al-Munawwarah, where on page 879, in interpreting
ayah 5 in Surat Taha:
they say: "The Most Gracious is firmly established on the
throne," and in the footnote they explicitly say: "Who
encompasses all creation and sits on the throne."
Similarly, be aware of all the
other parts of this book which liken Allah to His creation, like
on page 1799 where in ayah 42 of Surat al-Qalam:
they attribute the shin to
Allah. On page 1015 in interpreting Surat an-Nur, ayah 35:
they say "Allah is the
light" and in the footnote they say explicitly: "We
can only think of Allah in terms of our phenomenal experience."
Al-Mushabbihah are those who
liken Allah to the creation; they believe Allah resembles the
creation. They attribute to Allah places, directions, shapes,
and bodies, and they try to camouflage it by saying: "However,
we do not know how His place is, or how He is sitting, or how
His face is, or how His shin is, or how his light is." All
of that does not clear them of blasphemy.
Praise be to Allah the Lord of the worlds the One Who is clear
of resembling the creation, all nonbefitting attributes, and
all that which the blasphemers unrightfully say about Him.
And Allah knows best.
|